User Tools

Site Tools


en:users:drivers:ath10k:submittingpatches

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
en:users:drivers:ath10k:submittingpatches [2017/05/16 06:02]
Kalle Valo Adding subsections, fixing formatting, fixing links
en:users:drivers:ath10k:submittingpatches [2019/02/15 11:59]
Kalle Valo Add links to submitting patches and how to write git commit messages
Line 8: Line 8:
       * Cc: [[linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org]] ​       * Cc: [[linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org]] ​
  
-Preferably use [[en/​users/​drivers/​ath10k/​sources|ath.git master branch]] as the baseline for patches. Other trees can be used as well, but then the chances of conflicts are higher. ​+Preferably use [[en/​users/​drivers/​ath10k/​sources|ath.git master branch]] as the baseline for patches. Other trees can be used as well, but then the chances of conflicts are higher. 
 + 
 +You can follow the state of ath10k patch review from patchwork:​ 
 + 
 +[[https://​patchwork.kernel.org/​project/​linux-wireless/​list/?​state=*&​q=ath10k]]
  
 More info about submitting patches: ​ More info about submitting patches: ​
         * [[en/​developers/​Documentation/​SubmittingPatches|linux-wireless submitting patches instructions]] ​         * [[en/​developers/​Documentation/​SubmittingPatches|linux-wireless submitting patches instructions]] ​
-        * [[en/​developers/​Documentation/​git-guide|linux-wireless git guide]] ​+        * [[en/​developers/​Documentation/​git-guide|linux-wireless git guide]] 
 +        * [[https://​www.kernel.org/​doc/​html/​latest/​process/​submitting-patches.html|Linux kernel submitting patches]] 
 +        * [[https://​medium.com/​@steveamaza/​how-to-write-a-proper-git-commit-message-e028865e5791|How to write proper git commit messages]]
  
 ==== Guidelines ==== ==== Guidelines ====
Line 18: Line 24:
 Guidelines for patches are: Guidelines for patches are:
    
-          ​* MUST follow [[https://​www.kernel.org/​doc/​html/​latest/​process/​submitting-patches.html|Documentation/​SubmittingPatches]] +  ​* MUST follow [[https://​www.kernel.org/​doc/​html/​latest/​process/​submitting-patches.html|Documentation/​SubmittingPatches]] 
-          * MUST be compiler warning free.  +  * MUST follow [[en/​users/​Drivers/​ath10k/​CodingStyle|ath10k coding style]] 
-          * MUST be sparse warning free.  +  * MUST be compiler and sparse warning free.  
-          Commit log MUST not be empty.  +  [[https://​www.kernel.org/​pub/​software/​scm/​git/​docs/​git-send-email.html|git send-email]] SHOULD ​be used to submit the patch to avoid any formatting issues
-          The commit ​log MUST answer the question "​Why?":​  +  Patchsets SHOULD contain no more than 12 patches and include a cover letter.  
-             ​* Describe the motivation behind the bug.  +  * Commit ​log MUST answer the question "​Why?":​  
-             ​* How does it change the functionality from user's point of view?  +    * Describe the motivation behind the bug.  
-             ​* Does it fix a bug? If it does, please describe the bug (doesn'​t need to be long). Also if there'​s a public bug report add a link to the bug report.  +    * How does it change the functionality from user's point of view?  
-             ​* If a problem has been found during code review and doesn'​t fix a known issues, mention that in the commit log. +    * Does it fix a bug? If it does, please describe the bug (doesn'​t ​necessarily ​need to be long). Also if there'​s a public bug report add a link to the bug report ​or email describing the issue.  
-             ​* Ingo Molnar has written [[https://​lkml.kernel.org/​r/​20150314075357.GA8319@gmail.com|a nice description]] about what maintainers are looking from a commit log.  +    * If a problem has been found during code review and doesn'​t fix a known issue, mention that in the commit log this is a theoretical fix. 
-            If others have reported the issue commit ​log SHOULD use Reported-by:​ and Tested-by: tags.  +    * This also implies that the commit log MUST not be empty.  
-          * SHOULD be //mostly// checkpatch clean (though not all patchworks warnings make sense):  +    * Ingo Molnar has written [[https://​lkml.kernel.org/​r/​20150314075357.GA8319@gmail.com|a nice description]] about what maintainers are looking from a commit log. 
-            * Patches SHOULD be sent with git send-email tool.  +  Commit ​log MUST document the affected hardware versions, bus type and firmware version(s) tested, examples: 
-            * Patchsets SHOULD contain no more than 12 patches.  +    * QCA988X PCI 10.2.4-1.0-00037 
-            * Patches SHOULD follow [[en/​users/​Drivers/​ath10k/​CodingStyle|ath10k coding style]]  +    * QCA99X0/​QCA9984/​QCA4019 PCI/AHB 10.4-3.5.3-00053 
-            * It's RECOMMENDED to test patches with [[en/​users/​Drivers/​ath10k/​CodingStyle#​checking_code|ath10k-check]] ​+    * QCA6174 hw3.2 PCI WLAN.RM.4.4.1-00102-QCARMSWP-1 
 +    * QCA9377 SDIO WLAN.TF.1.1.1-00061-QCATFSWPZ-1 
 +  * SHOULD use [[https://​www.kernel.org/​doc/​html/​latest/​process/​submitting-patches.html#​using-reported-by-tested-by-reviewed-by-suggested-by-and-fixes|Reported-by:​ and Tested-by: tags]] if others have reported the issue. 
 +  * SHOULD use [[https://​www.kernel.org/​doc/​html/​latest/​process/​submitting-patches.html#​describe-changes|Fixes:​ tag]] if it fixes a regression caused by known commit
 +  * SHOULD be //mostly// checkpatch clean (though not all patchworks warnings make sense), it's RECOMMENDED to test patches with [[en/​users/​Drivers/​ath10k/​CodingStyle#​checking_code|ath10k-check]] ​as that will disable the useless warnings.
  
 The terminology is from [[http://​www.ietf.org/​rfc/​rfc2119.txt|http://​www.ietf.org/​rfc/​rfc2119.txt]] ​ The terminology is from [[http://​www.ietf.org/​rfc/​rfc2119.txt|http://​www.ietf.org/​rfc/​rfc2119.txt]] ​
Line 41: Line 51:
 The ath10k patch flow is this:  The ath10k patch flow is this: 
           * Patch gets posted to the mailing lists. ​           * Patch gets posted to the mailing lists. ​
-          * Kalle immediately ​applies the patch to pending and master-pending branches for build testing.  +          * Kalle applies ​ASAP (usually can take 1-3 business days) the patch to pending and master-pending branches for build testing.  
-          * Kalle waits two business days for patch being under review (unless the patch is urgent).  +          * Kalle waits minimum of two business days for patch being under review (unless the patch is urgent).  
-          * If no comments or warnings, Kalle applies the patch to ath-next branch and sends a "​Thanks,​ applied"​ reply.  +          * If no comments or warnings, Kalle applies the patch either to ath-current branch (for critical fixes) or to ath-next branch ​(new features, low priority fixes) ​and sends a "​Thanks,​ applied"​ reply.  
-          * Kalle merges ath-next to master branch immeadiately after the patch is applies.  +          * Kalle merges ath-next ​and ath-current ​to master branch immeadiately after the patch is applied.  
-          * Kalle merges ath-next into wireless-drivers-next roughly every 2-3 weeks  +          * Kalle merges ath-next into wireless-drivers-next ​tree and ath-current to wireless-drivers tree roughly every 2-3 weeks. 
-          * David Miller merges wireless-drivers-next into net-next every two weeks or so  +          * David Miller merges wireless-drivers-next into net-next ​tree and wireless-drivers to net tree every two weeks or so. 
-          * Linus Torvalds merges net-next ​into linux.git ​during [[https://​www.kernel.org/​doc/​Documentation/development-process/​2.Process|merge window]] ​+          * Linus Torvalds merges ​net every week and net-next during [[https://​www.kernel.org/​doc/​html/latest/​process/​2.Process.html|the merge window]] ​into linux.git .  
 + 
 +As a rough estimate it takes 2-4 months for a patch to propagate from ath-next to an official Linux release.
  
 +To clarify the meaning with ath-current and ath-next let's take a concrete example: let's say that the latest release from Linux is v4.9-rc2. If a patch is applied to ath-current it will most like be in v4.9-rc4 or v4.9-rc5 (usually it takes a minimum of one week to get to Linus' tree, sometimes more). But if the patch is applied to ath-next the first release it will be in is v4.10-rc1.
  
 +See also [[en/​users/​drivers/​ath10k/​sources|ath10k sources and branches]].
en/users/drivers/ath10k/submittingpatches.txt · Last modified: 2020/08/26 14:40 by Kalle Valo